Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Larry Walker's avatar

Six months and one day has always been the legal defining line between short abd long term rentals so I imagine that's not changing. Other vacation destinations are facing the same issues and there have been all sorts of legislative deterrents tried so I'm not sure there is a suitable more/affordable alternative. We have always been among the cheapest of Florida coastal destinations. Our visitors have not pushed back on the doubling of most rental rates since Covid so more small increases will likely not have much effect. Landlords have enjoyed the rent inflation of the last five years and most could easily absorb the higher fees if necessary although I don't expect many to take that route.

Expand full comment
Beach Bum 69's avatar

"Easily absorb the higher fees" for any rentals less than six months?...my arse! Watch what you wish for Cocoa Beach, you just may get it. Was never interested in the Airbnb crowd, but at those punitive rates my vacation home will now be off the market for snowbirds, its no longer worth the pain and additional risks to offset even less of the ownership costs. It will now sit vacant 9+ months of the year and local businesses will lose tourist revenue. I predict property value decreases from those who can't afford it and property tax revenue hits. It's not like insurance costs aren't skyrocketing too. Maybe studying what has and hasn't worked elsewhere first might be smarter? If the concern is parties there are other ways to deal with that, including a more realistic definition of short term rental length. Treating small property owners like piggy banks (or the root problem) hasn't worked for blue states, so good luck with that!

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts